Group Communication for Participation- MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theGroup Communicationfor Motivation and Participation. Answer: Introduction Group communication is the exchange of message between group members. These messages might verbal or non-verbal and help the group members to keep the group intact, through motivation, participation, determine goals and maintain the group identity. The communication also helps in making and deliberating on decisions(Goldberg, Larson, 2015). The purpose of communication within a group is to help spread ideas knowledge, information, build relationships and spreads and feelings (Rizzo, Fdida, 2014). Communication plays a key role in changing the attitude of members within the group since informed members have a more positive attitude than the less informed. Moreover, communication in a group helps to socialize and hence establish values in which the members share(Applbaum, 1979). Key Concepts of Communication The communication process in a group takes place when one party codes a message and sends it to the other party. This process follows a concept that involves: The sender, who is the person sending the message. The sender determines the kind of information to be sent, encode the information, which involves transforming the thoughts into a message that can be sent (Burtis, Turman, 2016). The channel of communication which involves the manner in which the message is sent: Channels of communication that are normally used include non-verbal communication, which is body language, audio transmission, video transmission, writing, and speaking (Derick, 2017). The one who receives the message is known as the receiver. The receiver decodes the message, which involves a process of mentally processing the message into a way that it can be understood. In some cases, the sent message fails to be decoded by the receiver due to barriers in communication. Such barriers may involve language (Cathcart, Samovar, 2014). Feedback is the last stage of the communication process; it may be given as a reaction or action, question or eve compliment, message feedback is very crucial in-group communication as it helps to make sure that the whole group is on the same page (Hirokawa, Poole, 2013). The concepts mentioned above will be used to analyze the group communication regarding on how well each stage is utilized to deliver the message between parties. For instance, the case of group 1 whose leader,for the purpose of understanding the concept, will be referred to as leader A,' communicates to the group members. This communication involves setting agendas and ways to execute them. The setting of agendas involves coding the message by encoding it from its thought form in a way that it can be transmitted (University, 2017). The message communicated by leader A involves visual aids and body language. The receiver of the message, which is the group gives, feedbacks through suggestions, questions, and compliments. The communication process conducted within this group portrays the efficiency in communication, as the sender and receiver are both participating ad also shows that the message is well understood. The other group which will be referred to as group 2, which is headed by leader B seem to be relying on oral communication only to discuss its agendas and the ways of executing them. The leader of this message communicates orally to t he group. Furthermore, it is observed that there is scattered feedback from the group, which is the receiver. This shows that the group leader does not adequately encode the information into the required message, the leader also fails to identify the mist appropriate channel to use in conveying the message and there is no reasonable follow-up to identify why the group fails to give a response(Ingram, 2017). Detailed Comparison of the ObservedGroups Group 1 Group 2 Information sharing High rate of information sharing among the members during discussions as well as during non-group activities Member rarely exchange information, and when the exchange of information takes place, it only revolves around group activities Relations Members of this group are observed to have a good relation such that they help each other even at a personal level, there is a lot of cohesion observed as consultation is very high among members during group discussion. The group members do not seem to relate freely with each other during group discussions as well as at personal level. Discussions During group meetings, discussions are observed to be lively and heated up among the members of this group. Also, a lot of questions and suggestions pop out all around the group during presentations. The group discussion rarely last for more than three minutes; it is also observed that only a few section of the group members seems to participate in the discussion. Suggestions and questions in the group are very few, and members seem not to take any initiative Division of tasks The division of responsibilities within the group are clearly defined, and cases of replication of tasks are absent The majority of the group members do not understand their roles and most of them are observed to be doing similar tasks. Most of the tasks are rarely completed in this group. Execution of agendas The group takes a short time to execute its agendas and performs them fully with few hiccups. The group activities take a lot of time to be executed, and it is filled with a lot of disagreements among the members. Some members of the group rarely participate in executing these agendas. Unity The members of this group are highly united and conduct activities together being group duties or individual duties Members are rarely seen to be working together either in group activities or personal activities. Proactivity This group is highly proactive and works to its best to deliver the best in their activities The members and the group at larger are not as active and rarely strives in executing its duties. Effectiveness of Group Communication Group communication helps the development of values, which promotes group culture, which helps identify each group. This culture is helpful in delivering messages to the group members since it defines a way in which messages are transmitted among the group members (Derick, 2017). Proper group communication also makes the group members respect each other. The respect observed on members is since members can express themselves (Jensen, Chilberg, 2016). Etiquette is also one of the results observed once there is effective group communication. This arises due to shared goals and agendas (Goldberg, Larson, 2015). Group Analysis Strong communication areas Group members can communicate fluently and deliver the message to the group members Members are also able to use various communication channels, such as audio, visual and body language in delivering the message. here is group cohesion, which has been brought about by proper group communication. Weaknesses in-group communication Some members of the group are yet to perfect the group communication process. The group communication within the members has not yet fully addressed all the agendas that the groups require to address. References Applbaum, R. (1979).The Process of group communication(1st ed.). Chicago: Science Research Associates. Burtis, J., Turman, P. (2016).Group communication pitfalls(1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE. Cathcart, R., Samovar, L. (2014).Small group communication(1st ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown Pub. Derick, W. (2017).The Communication Process.Cliffsnotes.com. Retrieved 11 May 2017, from https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/principles-of-management/communication-and-interpersonal-skills/the-communication-process Goldberg, A., Larson, C. (2015).Group communication(1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Hirokawa, R., Poole, M. (2013).Communication and group decision-making(1st ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Ingram, D. (2017).Effective Group Communication Processes.Smallbusiness.chron.com. Retrieved 11 May 2017, from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/effective-group-communication-processes-3187.html Jensen, A., Chilberg, J. (2016).Small group communication(1st ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co. Rizzo, L., Fdida, S. (2014).Networked group communication(1st ed.). New York: Springer. University, C. (2017).How Can I Monitor Groups?-Teaching Excellence Educational Innovation - Carnegie Mellon University.Cmu.edu. Retrieved 11 May 2017, from https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/instructionalstrategies/groupprojects/monitor.html